you're reading...

Sarah Baartmanisation Post Colonialism – South Africa

Letter to Ferial

You did well by relenting to the people’s wishes, because it is not just the ANC or Zuma who felt “Sarah Baartmanised”. As an artist who respects freedom of expression I understand the responsibilities that come with that freedom.

Yes, Zuma is the worst president and he has set back the feminist movement, but we can’t sacrifice one struggle for another. The denigration of black bodies is a sign of a deeper disease in our psyche, and has serious implications.

That it can be equated to freedom of speech and be protected by the Constitution is in itself unConstitutional and raises lots of questions about our “precious” and “perfect” Constitution. Could it be that the Constitution is not custom made for us? Shouldn’t it take into account the sensibilities of its people? As the editor of a black newspaper I commend you for listening to our wishes.

On the issue of people taking to the streets and boycotting your newspaper: I’m baffled that it is seen as bullying. During apartheid people boycotted so their voices could be heard. They used the might of the number of their wallets, they took to the streets to protest against their dehumanization.

Isn’t that their right? This seems to be a way to further silence the voice and wishes of the people. This is a great concern.

People are angry at Brett Murray at daring to think that he, as a white man, a descendant of an oppressive regime of slave owners and land thieves, the cause of our dehumanization, has a right to depict us in a dehumanizing manner under the guise of free speech.

I vaguely remember at the height of the Zimbabwe Uprisings, there was an online game depicting Mugabe as a baboon being fed bananas. It was a personal affront to me; it blatantly played into evil colonial stereotypes. Such is the case here as well.

I have noticed also how dismissive those fighting for freedom of speech have been of the black pain. This speaks volumes and we are listening. Talking of extending an olive branch, black people did that in 1994, they put a hold on their pain and celebrated a new day of possibilities.

To be insulted with poverty, non-transformation of the business sector, and liberal ideas that purport to speak for us, even as they deliver us as cheap labour to State Capital, and now this painting.

To call this painting a Sarah Baartmanisation of the black body is valid. It evokes those memories. Why Murray found it proper, as a depiction of Zuma, because of his character, is devoid of relevance. It was demeaning in the highest degree. Do we know if Sarah Baartman was a good person with high morals? Could it be possible she ‘deserved’ it because she did something society saw as despicable? Did we care to find out? No, we didn’t. Because it was not important.

What was important was the image of her beautyful black body on display, a vile social experiment. This is the image we have carried with us and it has shamed us, humiliated us. The image of a black man with his penis hanging out on display in galleries, plastered all over the internet, in your newspaper for our children to see, for the whole world to see, shifted something in me.

An animalistic howl died in my throat, perhaps a gene memory flashback coupled with the reality of my existence today. It felt like giving birth to death. Like this new SA is stillborn. This hurt is deep.

Now let’s equate the image of Zuma’s penis hanging out with the Reed dance where you see girl’s breasts out for all to see. You see, to say nudity is not a part of our culture is false, though it has never been to the extreme of seeing people’s privates. There are also Afrikan cultures where married women use nudity as a sign of protest. This is regarded as the highest form of protest.

The way of the Afrikan people has been regarded with ridicule since time immemorial. It has been seen as deplorable. It has been used as an excuse to see us already dehumanized by virtue of our ways. We have still been seen as a threat, like a lion, or maybe a hyena, or, come to think of it a baboon would be a threat. This has been used as a reason to, wipe us out, bring us to heel or civilize us.

Too many times I’ve read on social networks that we would still be in the bush without colonialism. As if our natural way of living was regressive. We, the Afrikans, have internalized these feelings of shame imposed upon us, which is why we find it easy to assimilate into the white culture and mostly pay lip service to our own today.

What I find most intense is our own chuckles at this painting as Black people. The jeers from all sectors saying Zuma deserved it. I don’t see how him deserving to be ridiculed for his ways correlates with the painting.

Because I don’t see Zuma when I look at the painting. I see a black man with his penis hanging out; as much as I didn’t see Mugabe in that online game, but saw a black man being portrayed as a baboon. Have we become so desensitized that we don’t see this?

I don’t think the issue is culture here, but dignity, and sensitivity to a horrid past full of dehumanization and other injustices. We as citizens of South Africa should own this pain collectively if we are serious about nation building. I am indignant.


About Simphiwe Dana

Musician, Writer, Activist, Mom


7 thoughts on “Sarah Baartmanisation Post Colonialism – South Africa

  1. I think I am starting to get a vague sense of the dehumanisation you speak of. This is mostly through the reactions from black people and organisations in the media. On the one hand I can understand your point that this debacle has again raised the specter of injustices of the past and that the racial stereotypification of the black man is again pushed to the fore.

    What I don’t understand is why the interpretation of the work stops there? I am not trying to be deliberately obtuse because the intention of Murray is also in the public domain. His intention is an expression of his frustration and disillusionment with Zuma and the current version of the ANC.

    From your article I see that the formula of a white man depicting a black body naked is incendiary. Given the context of the past I understand that. Effectively it means no rational discourse can take place on this subject. I am fine with that.

    What do we (and I mean as white South Africans who want to remain in SA) have do to help the black men and women of this country get past this pain?

    I read a few articles on the ANC website today: http://www.anc.org.za/docs/anctoday/2012/at22.htm#art3

    There is one by Thula Bopela titled ‘Irreperable damage’ where he makes it clear that the damage cannot be repaired. I quote ‘Who will repair all this damage? Is it reparable? I believe, truly and objectively, that South Africa is a society that has suffered irreparable damage, thanks to white civilization.’ Being on the ANC website and Bopela listed as an ‘ANC Veteran’ I imagine this statement carries some weight and is not too far outside general consensus within the ANC.

    So here is my question to you: what do the black people in South Africa expect from the white people who wish to remain? At the moment it seems we will never be able to let go of the past and move on. This will never allow healing and the steady decline of our country with all its people seems a certainty.

    Posted by Johann Botha (@jonahboat) | June 12, 2012, 23:12
  2. Reblogged this on zodwambambo and commented:
    Brilliant article by Dana, she put into words what I carried with a heavy heart.

    Posted by missmbambo | June 13, 2012, 18:38
  3. Thank you for this honest and thought-provoking response to the furore caused by the painting of President Zuma.

    Posted by gaiafrique | June 13, 2012, 20:11
  4. I have taken the liberty of responding to / commenting on your post in a post of my own – in which I reference your article. I hope that you do not mind?

    Posted by gaiafrique | June 14, 2012, 18:59
  5. Your silence speaks volumes.

    Posted by Johann Botha (@jonahboat) | June 15, 2012, 18:19
  6. Hi Johann, I read your comments with much fascination and got a modicum of the puzzlement white South Africans who would like to move past the past must feel…

    I don’t have all of the answers, perhaps none at all, I do know that until a man walks in another’s shoes he cannot truly empathize. So here’s my idea – learn black. Learn what it means to be a black person – ask, travel, read, get out of your comfort zone, go to places that only black people by and large go to, discover black people’s different cultures and traditions, their histories, their languages, the nuanced differences between different black people of different tribes and backgrounds.

    And once you’re on your way… and have fallen in love with just one aspect of “blackness” (as is inevitable), then introduce it to your friends and family.

    To better understand each other and how we can help each other move forward, white South Africa needs to learn as much about black South Africa as black people have been exposed to white culture, language, traditions and value systems.


    Posted by shakasisulu | August 5, 2012, 12:41


  1. Pingback: Umkhonto weSizwe – a nation degraded and derided? | Gaiafrique online - June 14, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Simphiwe Dana’s Archives

There was an error retrieving images from Instagram. An attempt will be remade in a few minutes.


My Community

Follow me on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: